“The older I get, the extra dangers there are of my child having one thing,” she mentioned. “It makes me ask myself, ‘If I take advantage of the embryo from once I was 31, will the newborn be more healthy?’” she mentioned. “The embryos have additionally been examined, so no less than I do know the fundamentals are OK.”
Dr. Fortunate Sekhon, who additionally works at RMA of New York, the fertility clinic, famous that although preimplantation genetic testing of embryos isn’t good, it might probably guarantee embryos have the proper variety of chromosomes, which reduces the chances of miscarriage.
Dr. Sekhon additionally believes that many {couples} ought to view I.V.F. as a backup, not a primary, choice. Many consumers, she mentioned, come to her considering they’ve little probability of conceiving naturally when they’re really in good well being to take action. “Most of those ladies can nonetheless have very wholesome infants,” she mentioned.
An exception is somebody like Ms. El-Badry Nance, who has the BRCA gene mutation. “They know one thing runs of their household,” mentioned Dr. Sekhon, “and people are causes to keep away from getting pregnant naturally.”
Medical doctors agree that I.V.F. is a numbers sport, and the extra frozen embryos it’s important to work with, the upper the prospect of success since not all unfreeze or implant correctly. Due to that, Dr. Sekhon believes most {couples}, if they’ll, ought to first attempt to conceive naturally earlier than utilizing frozen embryos.
“It’s a lot smarter to make use of your embryos when you actually need to,” she mentioned. “Isn’t it higher to save lots of them for a wet day?”
However some {couples} disagree. As Ms. Hartley put it: “We’ve got the science to do that. Let’s use it.”
